Jowenko WTC7 Demolition Interviews, 3 of 3

Uploaded by: einsteen
Video Description:
part III

Tags for this video: 911 Jowenko towers twin wtc7

Find more videos in the "Howto" category
See more videos uploaded by einsteen

Related Videos

9/11 Debunked: WTC 7's Collapse Explained	Who said no sound during the collapse ?	WTC 7 Silverstein Kerry Giuliani and Danny Jowenko

BBC Reports Live that WTC7 has fallen, yet it still stands	WTC7 controlled demolition, side-by-side video	WTC 7 Foreknowledge

Share This Video:

Comments for this video: Show || Hide

Comments for this video on YouTube

This was a good ... ( 1 year ago by Curveball)

This was a good video. Very interesting. But my implication, there was plenty of time to rig WTC 7 with explosives after the towers feel. Maybe there is come claim to arrest for those that did it, but it does not prove government involvement.
You'll need more, because one could say the building owner paid people off to do it so he could avoid high cost repair. That does not involve the government.

Or the fire ... ( 1 year ago by jizzmonger)

Or the fire weakened the bridging trusses and caused the collapse.
LOL

Or not. NIST did a ... ( 1 year ago by Curveball)

Or not. NIST did a test with an exact model, burned the fire at a higher temperature and longer length of time, and the floor only sagged about three inches. However in the computer model, it took them sagging 43 inches before collapse began. They did not come close to that in the real simulation.

Why would they test ... ( 1 year ago by jizzmonger)

Why would they test a floor assembly to develope a hypothesis about building 7?

Why doesn't he tell ... ( 1 year ago by wolfnipplechips)

Why doesn't he tell him that the fire was so heavy the firefighter couldn't enter the building and that by the end there was fire on all floors. What about the 20 storey gash, the 5 storey buldge in the structure, the penthouse collapsing first?

Why is anyone even ... ( 1 year ago by donpark1)

Why is anyone even discussing whether or not it was a demolition? You can see with your untrained eyes that it was. But what I do need is for the media to stop asking about other diversionary topics(as important as they might be) and ask questions about 9/11. Things need to be answered. American lives were deliberately taken. That's a FACT. We just need to know who, why, and how. I can draw a pretty clear picture myself, but everyone needs to know who, why and how.

Hardly devastating, ... ( 1 year ago by PoetryHound)

Hardly devastating, svelte. That's the guy who was inside WTC 7 when both towers collapsed & he was blown into the air. Gee, I wonder what could have caused that. A single demo charge in the morning that brought down the building 7 hours later? Sure bet. BTW, the guy's story was reported by NIST, not the Commission. You sure are confused, aren't you?

svelte is a guy ... ( 1 year ago by PoetryHound)

svelte is a guy starts who with the conclusion that there were bombs in WTC 7 & then works backwards to find evidence of them. So he found a video shot at 10:15am. It shows people responding to loud blasts coming from some unidentified place. And he claims the blasts were actually demo charges inside WTC 7 that went off at 5:20pm. Completely made up. And very dishonest. But that's the kind of crap he tries to feed everyone.

Array ( 11 months ago by Aanthanur)

roflmao
im sure Larry would hate Danny when he knows what he says^^
weg ermee.

9/11 is joke in yo' ... ( 9 months ago by dust4ngel)

9/11 is joke in yo' town.

This Jowenko guy ... ( 9 months ago by danieleriskay)

This Jowenko guy clearly doesn't understand how sneaky muslims are.

pleasae tell me ... ( 8 months ago by bohemiangrove)

pleasae tell me about these SNEAKY muslims. Love to hear about them

poetryhound is a ... ( 6 months ago by SandovalAlarcon)

poetryhound is a fool, useful idiot, liar, enemy agent or some combination. Everyone watch architect richard gage's '911 blueprint for truth', diesel and office fires in a few places did not create statistically symmetrical collapse at almost freefall speed, anymore than i met with santa on the easter bunny's spaceship to hijack the deathstar. poetryhound is a fool, useful idiot, liar, enemy agent or some combination.

good point, the ... ( 6 months ago by thelastbernier)

good point, the interviewers story of wtc 7 was from fema. I guess he didn't use the governments story because... WTC 7 WAS NEVER IN THE COMMISSION REPORT. CAN YOU GUESS WHY POETRY HOUND? IT MAKES NO SENSE OTHER THAN CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!

you're absolutely ... ( 6 months ago by thelastbernier)

you're absolutely right donpark1, the media has been avoiding building 7. There are many adults in america who don't even remember the year the 9/11 attacks took place. remember when all of america just cared about michael jackson and paris hilton? it's almost unreal what america has become.

"WTC 7 WAS NEVER IN ... ( 6 months ago by PoetryHound)

"WTC 7 WAS NEVER IN THE COMMISSION REPORT"
Neither was WTC 3,4,5, or 6. Tthe 911 Commissioners were not engineers. Why would you want non-engineers to explain damage and collapse of buildings? That task was appropriately given to FEMA & NIST. The purpose of the Commission was to examine HOW 911 could happen & what could be done to prevent it. Asking the Commission to examine the building collapses would be like asking the NIST engineers to examine the hijackers' global movements.

okay i admit you ... ( 6 months ago by thelastbernier)

okay i admit you got me there on the commission report. BUT, if you think that the task of explaining the towers collapse was given "appropriately" to FEMA (who use the pancake theory) and NIST (who proved pancake theory false and dubbed the towers collapse as "unexplainable") then you need to start thinking.

Yes, the task of ... ( 6 months ago by PoetryHound)

Yes, the task of examining structural engineering issues is appropriately given to structural engineers, no non-engineers like you who misinterpret what they say.

The point of having ... ( 6 months ago by thelastbernier)

The point of having experts is to explain to everyone else how something like steel framed towers collapse.
here's a quote from NIST. "We are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse"
i guess i misinterpreted this quote completely. i could have sworn they said they can't explain shit.

Like I said, ... ( 6 months ago by PoetryHound)

Like I said, misinterpretation by people like you. If there's a 50 ft tall house of cards & someone takes out some cards from the middle and the whole thing collapses, you'd complain that it's suspicious just because we can't explain what every card did & thus there is no "full explanation." If you're quoting NIST, you should have read more & found that their analysis covered the series of events up to the point where the global collapses became inevitable.

if their research ... ( 6 months ago by thelastbernier)

if their research had a conclusion, it would matter.

WTC7 = Controlled ... ( 6 months ago by felicity5150)

WTC7 = Controlled Demolition = Inside Job. Wake up America, you need to take back your country.

Indonesia supports ... ( 4 months ago by trisetyarso)

Indonesia supports investigation for the existence of controlled demolition in 9/11 !!

How does one ... ( 3 months ago by BeanGene)

How does one misinterpret WTC 7? An 8-year old can see its controlled demolition. Sure it is emotionally painful. But, then again I'm not emotionally dependant on "experts" to do my thinking for me. Expecally, not those who have such a glaring conflict of interest. Is PHound really saying that the families of the 9/11 victims, who requested the investigation, did so for concern over the building's structual integrety and 4 a improved military response. Get a life! Keelhaul the guilty MFers!

Tell a friend:

URL
Embed Code