Richard Gage on WTC7

Uploaded by: corbettreport
Video Description:
http://www.corbettreport.com
The Corbett Report interviews Richard Gage, the founding member and chief spokesperson for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth about the controlled demolitions of the twin towers (WTC 1 and WTC 2) and the Salomon Brothers Building (WTC 7) at the World Trade Center site. In this clip, Mr. Gage discusses the conventional controlled demolition of WTC7, as evidenced by its symmetrical, freefall collapse and video evidence of mistimed charges. For more information, please visit The Corbett Report, or go to the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth home page at ae911truth.org

Tags for this video: 9-11 9/11 911 architects collapse demolition engineers explosions towers truth twin wtc wtc7

Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by corbettreport

Related Videos

WTC 7 Collapse Explanation	Richard Gage on Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth	9/11 ACI - WTC 7 Implosion by Richard Gage Part I

WTC 7 Silverstein Kerry Giuliani and Danny Jowenko	Sir Rudy admits WTC7 was fed black-op center	Danny Jowenko on WTC 7 - 02-22-07

Share This Video:

Comments for this video: Show || Hide

Comments for this video on YouTube

Why would Gage make ... ( 1 year ago by PoetryHound)

Why would Gage make the false assertions that the WTC 7 collapse was symmetrical & that it collapsed into its own footprint? The seismic record showed an 18 sec collapse, indicating it fell in sections, starting with the heavily damaged south side you can't see in the videos. WTC 7 slammed into 30 W. Broadway, requiring its demo and rebuilding. So much for falling in its "footprint."

Gage is an ... ( 1 year ago by PoetryHound)

Gage is an architect, yet doesn't discuss the unusual structural design of WTC 7 with its major use of transfer trusses. Instead, he makes claims about a demolition. But he's not a demo expert. Why post a video by an expert if he speaks on things outside his area of expertise. He claims the little bursts of smoke and ash are actually demo charges going off. Nonsense. No demo experts say that.

NIST didn't analyze ... ( 1 year ago by PoetryHound)

NIST didn't analyze post-collapse phenomenon like the debris hotspots. But it's funny to see svelte jumping up and down insisting that there just had to be molten steel. But the reports of it were anecdotal. The people who made the comments about it were not in a position to know the composition of the hotspots, & the aerial infrared scans showed no temps hot enough to melt steel. So much for the "molten steel" myth.

One thing is sure, ... ( 1 year ago by PoetryHound)

One thing is sure, svelteShill: Thermite cannot keep metal in a molten form for 5 minutes, let alone for weeks. The reaction ends & then the metal cools. That's it. There were no ongoing thermite reactions in the debris piles observed by anyone. The anecdotal references were to pools, not explosive thermite reactions. Big difference.

I don't have a ... ( 1 year ago by psikeyhackr)

I don't have a problem with an investigation but do we need an investigation to be told the tons of steel and tons of concrete on every level of the WTC? How much steel was on the 81st floor that had to weaken in 56 minutes?
Do you need a PhD in physics and masters in engineering to know every level had to be strong enough support all levels above it? Didn't the designers in the 60s have to figure that out? So why haven't we heard it from EXPERTS in SIX YEARS?
watch?v=z0kUICwO93Q

The trouble with ... ( 5 months ago by psikeyhackr)

The trouble with what you are saying is that MASSIVE damage caused by EXTERNAL sources should not have caused a straight down symmetrical collapse. Damage from external sources should have damaged one side more resulting in a tilt to one side. Plus how do you explain the sudden crimp in the roof just before collapse JUST LIKE A NORMAL CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.

Tell a friend:

URL
Embed Code