On 9/11, WTC1 Hit WTC7, Seriously Damaging the South Side

Uploaded by: representativepress
Video Description:
"The biggest decision we had to make on the first day was to clear the area and create a collapse zone around the severely damaged 7 World Trade Center, a 47-story building heavily involved in fire. A number of fire officers and companies assessed the damage to the building. The appraisals indicated that the building's integrity was in serious doubt.
I issued the orders to pull back the firefighters and define the collapse zone. It was a critical decision; we could not lose any more firefighters. It took a lot of time to pull everyone out, given the emotionalism of the day, communications difficulties, and the collapse terrain. - FDNY Chief of Department Daniel Nigro
http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2008/08/on-911-wtc2-hit-wtc7-seriously-damaging.html
I hope we can all concentrate on ending the unjust policies like supporting Israel and put this distraction behind us, because it hinders efforts to expose Zionism.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1bm2GPoFfg &feature=PlayList&p=F81BB573C9C0C7B2&index=0&playnext=1
What Motivated the 9/11 Hijackers?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1bm2GPoFfg &feature=PlayList&p=F81BB573C9C0C7B2&index=0&playnext=1
SCANDAL: 9/11 Commissioners Bowed to Pressure to Suppress Main Motive for the 9/11 Attacks.
http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2006/09/reviews-of-without-precedent-inside.html
"Sit Down!" The Power to Silence
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BuTQ6ystWrw &feature=PlayList&p=7D2F342A1F2AEA82&index=0&playnext=1
Damage to South Side of WTC7 See:
http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2008/08/damage-to-south-side-of-wtc7.html
or
http://tinyurl.com/WTC7South
And it did NOT fall "into its footprint," it damaged surrounding buildings
http:///www.TinyUrl.com/20WBway
http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2008/08/was-30-west-broadway-inside-footprint.html
Facts the "9/11 Skeptics" don't want you to see: REAL 911 Truth
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGAoRrBoPRM &feature=PlayList&p=0EA5787F8154537B&index=0&playnext=1
Eyewitness accounts from firemen such as Captain Chris Boyle and Deputy Chief Peter Hayden
http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2006/09/wtc-7-was-severely-damaged-on-south.html
http://tinyurl.com/2sbf2c
The Archives: September 1998 Fireground Tactics
Evacuation Decision Making By JOHN NORMAN
"One of the most common structures today is the strip mall built with steel bar joists and metal deck roofs. A serious fire in one of these structures should be expected to produce roof collapse in as little as five to 10 minutes. As such, they too should be attacked from defensive positions. Steel does have one advantage over wood trusses, in that if the steel can be cooled with hose streams, it will retain and even regain its strength."
"Class 1 (fire-resistive) buildings typical of high-rise construction usually are designated as having three- or four-hour fire resistance ratings. In the past, that was taken to mean that they would never be a serious collapse threat. While this is usually the case in the completed structures, it is not a guarantee, particularly in the steel-framed high-rise that relies on some type of spray-on or membrane fireproofing to protect the steel. The 1 Meridian Plaza fire in Philadelphia proved that these can be severe dangers under the wrong set of circumstances."
NIST FAQ
http://tinyurl.com/NISTFAQ

Tags for this video: 9/11 911 Center collapse Conspiracy Damage Debunked FDNY Firemen Fires Nigro Trade World WTC WTC1 WTC2 WTC7

Find more videos in the "Education" category
See more videos uploaded by representativepress

Related Videos

Representative Press's Mission as YouTube Reporter + Debunking Bhutto - Osama bin Laden & WTC7	9/11 Conspiracy Theories Debunked	9/11 Home Video of 2nd Airplane hit

The True Lies of 9/11 (Part 2)	"8:46 A.M." - A Traditional, Serious Mime Sketch about 9/11	Facts "9/11 Skeptics" don't want you to see: REAL 911 Truth

Share This Video:

Comments for this video: Show || Hide

Comments for this video on YouTube

Good response. ... ( 2 months ago by deke76)

Good response. Please inform us all as to how it was impossible to do so in partially empty buildings. Floors were refitted, businesses moved temporarily, and the elevators upgraded over a severeal month period. It could be done and obviously was. What bothers you is that the official story doesn't hold up under scrutiny. Until you wake up alongside the growing majority, you will continue to rant for no reason. Please tell us what you think brought those buildings down. Hint: not fires.

Present the ... ( 2 months ago by gh201059)

Present the evidence as to what floors were refitted, what offices from which companies were moved and what company upgrades the elevators! Present the interviews of the security staff that would of allowed passes the people who were the contractors doing the work as well the firms they represent and the contracts that were signed.Explain why is it the WTC towers began their collapse into the floors below right where they were impacted & the floors beams were unable to support the weight above!

Look up the ... ( 2 months ago by deke76)

Look up the interview with Scott Forbes. There's a good example of what was possbile. Interviews with security staff? What interviews are those?
Rigging the building would allow them to start a collapse at any area they choose. It has already been shown mathematically that the collapses as they were were impossible due to a gravity-driven collapse.
The NIST report on WTC7 is a joke. As an engineer, I can tell you it has gotten a lot of laughs among professionals.

The Iraq Liberation ... ( 2 months ago by gh201059)

The Iraq Liberation Act 1998."It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime."President George W. Bush has often referred to the Act and its findings to argue that the Clinton Admin. supported regime change in Iraq & its believed that Iraq was developing weapons of mass destruction.The Act was cited as a basis of support in the Congress!

I listened to the ... ( 2 months ago by gh201059)

I listened to the interview with Scott Forbes & all I can say is he saw people who were doing maintenance work in the WTC towers one fine day. Even Perry Mason, Columbo, and CSI episodes would not write that kind of laughable conjecture into their scripts.Besides that one visit could not wire 3 towers with explosives!Interviews with Security Staff? Exactly! NONE!Why not? Not a single one has come forward & suggested one single bit of suspicious reports they may have witnessed.

Dude, seriously. ... ( 2 months ago by deke76)

Dude, seriously. Your fake "outrage" does nothing for your case. You don't see shutting down half a building at night with ID-less "maintainence people" as a possbile issue? You see what you want to see, rather than look at possibilities. Also to your point about coming forward - who would come forward and why? So they can be killed? Are you that naive? I suppose you think Oswald was able to get Kennedy's head to snap back and to the left with a bullet from behind. Wake up. Use your brain.

Concerning JFK I am ... ( 2 months ago by gh201059)

Concerning JFK I am 120% convinced that the final shot was from the grassy knoll.That I can know beyond a reasonable doubt!Regarding Scott Forbes & his comments I suggest you listen to it again and ask yourself this. Just because there were maintenance people in the bldg. is it plausible for them to wire all 3 WTC bldgs.?Obviously not.Would they have been allowed past security without a check of their equipment for a bomb threat? After 1993 WTC bombing do you think bombs could make it in there?

You think everyone ... ( 2 months ago by deke76)

You think everyone and everything that went into those buildings was checked? Not a chance. The guy filling the Coke machines didn't have to show his stacks of soda to the security folks. There just wasn't enough manpower to do that sort of thing.
You wanted examples of how they could have done it. I have provided that. It's unlikely any security checked out maintenance people since they were there to do a job.
When I went to WTC in 98', only those going to the roof were checked.

Well Propane burns ... ( 2 months ago by metagross86)

Well Propane burns hotter that Jet fuel, which jet fuel contain kerosene. If you use propane on a grill and leave it on for a couple of hours it won't melt nor breakdown. I mean I see these video on youtube about explosion. As far as building 7, WTC 4, 5, and 6 took much heavy damage than 7 with at least 2 or 3 floor still standing before they demolished it.

Then explain how ... ( 2 months ago by metagross86)

Then explain how Building 4, 5, 6, was completely pulverized by the collapse of the towers, which they were closer than building 7, and manage to stand two or three stories before the clean-up of ground zero? I saw it loose change and it got me thinking of how come 47 story building collapse. Furthermore, in history on 3 buildings had collapse due to fire. If that's the case a building in Madrid 3 years ago was on Fire for 10 hours and the construction wasn't complete and DID NOT COLLAPSE!

Study the ... ( 2 months ago by gh201059)

Study the architecture of the WTC 7 towers and your answer begins there.The support beams in the WTC 7 were laid out differently in the lower 10 floors then the rest of the structure due to site accomadations.The other towers were pulverized however so was the WTC 7 which received the brunt of its damage on the bottom right corner as evidence by pics, & firemen testimony. The building was literally scooped out in that corner from damage. Watch the collapse as it leans to that corner as it falls!

why should we trust ... ( 2 months ago by mczakk)

why should we trust someone like you, who have not even been there? or someone who was even in WTC7? THIS IS DISINFORMATION!
Barry Jennings died. Why? Because he knew the truth. Wake up people. Jennings died only a few weeks before the "explanation" of the wtc7-collapse were updated officially! Thats a FACT!
COINCIDENT? once more?
Wake up!
911=inside job

Some people just ... ( 2 months ago by Sandberg1972)

Some people just seem to pass by the FACT that WTC7 collapsed in 2 stages, where in the 2nd stage the entire perimeter plus the rest of the structure (minus the EPH) collapsed in just under 7 secs.
Anyone who knows anything about steel knows this cannot be caused by ANYTHING ELSE than some form of CD.
I mean, forget ur special design, ur fires, ur local damage, it won't happen, such a neat & symmetrical collapse, without carefully timed explosives charges.
That's basic common sense.

tisk tisk ( 1 month ago by zepa22)

tisk tisk

peace and justice ... ( 1 month ago by tawfikakkad)

peace and justice to all the American , from a loving Syrian ,,

I thought this was ... ( 1 month ago by odetoinsolence)

I thought this was a pretty good debunking vieo...for a minute. Does not the NIST report say that WTC7 is the first case of a mere FIRE bringing down a skyscraper?
"Visconti, he was on West Street, and I guess he had another report of further damage either in some basements and things like that-"
Quote from the link with the alleged damage to building 7. Why would the BASEMENTS be damaged to the point where they might cause collapse? The same thing with the towers - basements blasted.

And I can't say I ... ( 1 month ago by odetoinsolence)

And I can't say I see how we're supposed to accept a colorful diagram as evidence of extensive damage to the facade of the building. But then I guess it really doesn't matter too much, as NIST does not attribute the collapse to structural damage inflicted by the collapse of The Two Towers.
Looking at this map, I cannot understand how the basements of seven would have been damaged:
ht tp://ww w.stagedterror. com/images/WTC%20Complex. jpg

ht tp://ww ... ( 1 month ago by odetoinsolence)

ht tp://ww w.firehouse. com/911/magazine/towers. ht ml
Scroll down on this page & take a look @ the gash displayed in a skyscraper across from Tower 2. Why will not they show us the supposed gash in 7? No pictures, no video of it.
Furthermore, this skyscraper RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET from Tower 2 did not collapse. Not from fire & not from structural damage. Refer back to that map & see how far away WTC7 is.

The narrator does a ... ( 1 month ago by deke76)

The narrator does a fine job of editing this video to make Barry Jennings sound like he was saying something else. Watch the full clip and you will see that Barry was saying that he experienced explsions before the towers collapsed.
Oh yeah, Barry Jennings died on 8/16/08 from an undisclosed reason. Conveniently 5 days before the WTC7 NIST report came out.

Yeah, he pretty ... ( 1 month ago by odetoinsolence)

Yeah, he pretty much said the official explanation made no sense, as he walked over dead bodies from a blast in WTC 7. This other guy, Kenny Johannemann, who witnessed explosions in the basments of the twin towers also ended up dead. There are very many "coincidences" in the 9/11 story that's been scripted for us...

Yeah, Kenny was an ... ( 1 month ago by deke76)

Yeah, Kenny was an odd story too. Michael Hess, who was with Jennings that day, has changed his story now. He went on radio on 9/11 and said the same things that Barry Jennings did. Not surprising since he works for Guiliani now.

first Larry ... ( 1 month ago by zxy009)

first Larry silverstein the lease holder for the wtc admitted on live tv to pulling wtc 7

The whole thing was ... ( 1 month ago by LadyGrace2)

The whole thing was fake done by bush the loser. U are a retard it is FAKE FAKE FAKE all the Live footage on thwe day was 17secs to be ddelayed lol there was a few things like as the nose of the planes going through the buildings yet a day later it was changed lol or they hid the part where it went though. No osama bin trash can dude done anything they seemed to have found the passports in tacted lol HOW TH E hell unless they made then of blah blah

NIST admitted that ... ( 2 weeks ago by 911debunkerschannel)

NIST admitted that the diesel fuel on the premises "played no role in the destruction of WTC 7", and that "the damage from the debris from WTC 1 had little effect on initiating the collapse".

Tell a friend:

URL
Embed Code