Ron Paul on CNN Larry King Live 2008.01.02

Uploaded by: peacespeech
Video Description:
GOP presidential candidate Ron Paul talks about his campaign for the White House.
original location: http://edition.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2008/01/03/larry.king.live.ron.paul.cnn?iref=videosearch
.

Tags for this video: 2008 CNN election GOP King Larry Paul Ron

Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by peacespeech

Related Videos

Ron Paul on This Week with George Stephanopoulos (07/08/07)	King Unplugged on Cooper During CNN Debate Audio Debacle	Suze Orman on Ron Paul's economics. 1/2/08

Ron Paul reminds Stephanopoulos of his bet	Larry King interviewing Jon Stewart	Barack Obama- Larry King Live

Share This Video:

Comments for this video: Show || Hide

Comments for this video on YouTube

Medical care of ... ( 1 year ago by observationspring)

Medical care of people who cannot afford it should depend on charity? Specifically on charity from churches? Obviously concern for common decency and for civility does not enter into Ron's reasoning.

Time for the " ... ( 1 year ago by markotraco)

Time for the "anti-war" left to buck up. Are they really for bringing the troops home or just driven by hatred for GWB and Repubs. Here's a REAL anti-war candidate that actually want to bring ALL troops home. If it means that much to them, then vote Ron Paul. But I think I know the answer already, since the only consistent anti-war candidate on the left is totally ignored. If Paul isn't on the ballot election day, then I have better things to do than wait in line to vote for generic leadership.

Yes you're right. ... ( 1 year ago by markotraco)

Yes you're right. But as far as I'm concerned Ron Paul is actually middle of the road. He proposes the very ideals of our founding fathers and the constitution. A country based on individual liberty and economic liberty. The basis that made this country as great as it is and made it different than any in the history of the world. The basic values that made this country the place where so many foreigners wanted to leave their homelands for.

I'm with you....but ... ( 1 year ago by markotraco)

I'm with you....but I wish I could actually believe that. Honestly I wish I could, but I just can't. You're relying a lot on "the people," and frankly I don't think there's much there. Folks complain about status quo, but in the end they're content with it. This IS NOT 1776 America, this is an America who is blind to being blindsided by its own government.

Charity doesn't ... ( 1 year ago by bassdefender)

Charity doesn't fall under common decency but getting help from bureaucrats who give you the forcibly taken (taxed) income of someone else does? Give it a rest man. Soon health care will look like the post office, DMV, public school system, welfare/social security/medicare/medicaid/ mess. When health care becomes free is when it will really get expensive.
Peace

"getting help from ... ( 1 year ago by observationspring)

"getting help from bureaucrats who give you the forcibly taken (taxed) income of someone else does?"
Spoken like a true psychopath. Do you ever feel lonely? If you don't think the officials you elect are serving you, fix the way the elections work.
Peace

On Jan 17th, please ... ( 1 year ago by jwilson770)

On Jan 17th, please help Dr. Paul as he continues his crusade against the evil neoconservatives.
w w w.benjaminsforpaul.c o m
^^^ This is the *official* website for the 3rd MONEY BOMB. Please copy and repost... everywhere.

I feel the same way ... ( 11 months ago by millionlittle)

I feel the same way. If it's going to be between Huckabee and Clinton or something similar, I won't bother voting. Do people recognize that across the board, democrats and republicans, a Ron Paul presidential candidacy would be popular. Hilary vs. Paul! There'd be no contest. Paul would sap away liberals and democrats to him and republicans would get out just to defeat Hilary. And I doubt the chances of the other "stay the course" republican candidates vs. a democrat running for "change".

The left is ... ( 11 months ago by derner22)

The left is traditionally more interventionist than the right, they're not gonna vote for Paul.

Our interests in ... ( 11 months ago by millionlittle)

Our interests in the world require us to be in 130 countries and having 700 bases overseas?
I'm all for a strong military and asserting our interests, but not so broadly that we are trying to micro-manage the world. I also doubt it's in our long-term interests because it's unsustainable economically. Thinking otherwise is pie in the sky!

Yeah, I agree. ... ( 11 months ago by millionlittle)

Yeah, I agree. Liberals are interventionists and if this was over intervening in Kosovo or just stepping aside from Palestine/Israel disputes they'd be spinning Paul as an isolationist. But they can't do that because of how unpopular Bush has made our meddling abroad. And I'd guess that more of the "average joe" democrats would be attracted to a candidate overtly against all of that. I can dream anyway. :-)

You have just ... ( 11 months ago by TAMARLANE)

You have just described what is holding the world together. Not what is driving it apart.
What kind of world would t be without the US?

No way. Democrats ... ( 11 months ago by markotraco)

No way. Democrats would never vote for him. No way. Democrats for the most part, and to a lesser extent Republicans, will not vote for someone who won't promise they'll do things for them. It wasn't always like this in the US. Unfortunately, Democracy, even a republic like ours that was built to protect the minority and civil and economic rights, will eventually lead to socialism.

I think the Mongols ... ( 10 months ago by MiddletownDreamz)

I think the Mongols and the Tatars once thought the same way.

I can't speak for ... ( 10 months ago by rhythmghost)

I can't speak for Mongols.
The Tatars have evolved.
If you want to know about Tatars, the Tatars of today, read a little about Kazan Russia.

Unfortunately, I ... ( 10 months ago by jhwheeler7)

Unfortunately, I have to agree with you; I think that when you have a country (hell, a whole planet) full of people who can't think for themselves and can be swayed by charisma, evil will triumph. If it's pure, blatant evil, perhaps not; but someone like Hillary Clinton, or Barack Obama (who isn't evil, just somewhat naÃ¯ve), who can charm the entire nation, will win, and instigate their idiotic plans for "change".

Absolutely...and ... ( 10 months ago by markotraco)

Absolutely...and then the only way a "Conservative" party can win is to be less conservative...i.e. they must promise things to people to keep up with the liberal politicians....even though the constitution never envisioned that politicians would even have this kind of power over economic liberty...which by the way is just as important as (or incidental to) individual liberty. Americans have totally lost the ability to grasp that fact.

Yes the Kazan ... ( 10 months ago by MiddletownDreamz)

Yes the Kazan Tatars. There is still a compact community of such people in the upper Volga; descendants of the Golden Horde. The Crimean Tatars are also struggling to re-assert themselves in the Peninsula.

The Golden Horde of ... ( 10 months ago by TAMARLANE)

The Golden Horde of course came after Ghengis fought against the original Tatars in their homeland, the Caucusus Mountains. The original Tatars, like my family, and many others, never mixed blood with Mongols. Mother in law for example was 4'10" blond hair, blue eyes, quite beautiful by Western standars. Look like one of the Gabor sisters.Zsa Zsa, Eva or (you may not be familiar with them but I'm sure you could find a youtube video featuring Zsa Zsa gabor. )

Yes I know of the ... ( 10 months ago by MiddletownDreamz)

Yes I know of the Gabor sisters. They are of Hungarian descent. I thought the original Tatar tribe lived near the Manchurian border not too far from North Korea.

The ORIGINAL Tatars ... ( 10 months ago by TAMARLANE)

The ORIGINAL Tatars are from the Caucusus.
Only after Genghis did they intermingle with the Mongols. They were carried away with Geghis because he did not want to fight them again. Too costly.
The Tatar language is the basis for Turkish, and the only other 3 languages related are Finnish, Hungarian Magyar, and Albanian.

I thought that the ... ( 10 months ago by MiddletownDreamz)

I thought that the Turkic-languages were related to Finno-Ugrian and that its origins were from the Altay region of central Asia.

I believe you are ... ( 10 months ago by TAMARLANE)

I believe you are correct. Finno-Ugrian.
Not sure about the origins.
Tatarcha is pretty old. Before recorded history?

k Im stripping down ... ( 2 months ago by 006005)

k Im stripping down.......you boys watching???? send me a message B

Tell a friend:

URL
Embed Code